The Big Bang Never Happened

The theory of the Big Bang is based on a catholic church dogma referred to as “creatio ex nihilo” (creation from nothing). It was first proposed by a catholic priest and mathematician named Georges Lemaître. His goal was to make science compatible with religion. Lemaître was invited to London in order to take part in a meeting of the British Association on the relation between the physical Universe and spirituality. There he proposed that the Universe expanded from an initial point, which he called the "Primeval Atom" and developed in a report published in Nature. Lemaître himself also described his theory as "the Cosmic Egg exploding at the moment of the creation"; it became better known as the "Big Bang theory," a term coined by Fred Hoyle.

One of the many problems with this theory is that it claims that all matter was magically created out of an abstract concept like “nothing” or “energy” or “a singularity”. All objects (matter) have a 3d shape / surface. There is no physical mechanism by which an object can appear out of nothing, nor can an object be converted into nothingness. There also is no actual evidence that such a miracle is possible. Objects can only move, that’s what they’ve been doing for all eternity. Matter cannot be created or destroyed. For example, a tree does not appear from 'nothing' (whatever that is), it grows from a seed by having more molecules added to it. Creation from nothing is an impossible miracle that never happens. The only way to 'create' something is to use existing materials. Like using wood to create a house, for example.

Another problem with the Big Bang theory is that it reifies the concept “space” into a physical object which can expand. First they claim that space is matterless, and then they say that this matterless concept is expanding. Concepts such as space, time, love, justice, adventure, etc. cannot expand, only an object such as a balloon is capable of expanding. The scientific establishment uses a phenomena known as “redshift” to try and support this nonsense. However, astronomer Halton Arp has shown evidence that low redshift galaxies are connected to high redshift quasars. This finding contradicts the idea that redshift is always a reliable indicator of distance. As the vibration that we perceive as 'light' propagates through it's medium, it eventually weakens, especially while having to pass through various gases and plasmas and will therefore shift to the red spectrum. Incidentally, this also explains why the night sky isn't filled with infinite star light. It's because light vibrations don't propagate forever, they come in contact with objects which cause the vibration to weaken. So this “expansion of space” idea is based off of the mathematician’s irrational interpretation of redshift.

The so called “Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation” is also used as evidence, even though this has absolutely nothing to do with the Big Bang. The CMB is just the temperature of the observable universe and temperature is a concept which we use to measure the motion of matter. What this really means is that there is a physical medium of vibrating particles. Ironically, a lot of pre-Big Bang theories actually 'predicted' the temperature of the observable universe much more accurately than the big bang theory did. So the CMB cannot be used as evidence for a Big Bang.

So, lets review. The Big Bang theory relies on reifying abstract concepts and claims that all matter was created out of nothing. In addition to this, there is absolutely no evidence to support this nonsense. The only rational conclusion is that the universe is infinite and eternal.